ManageEngine OpManager vs. Auvik Network Management: A comparative guide
An in-depth guide explaining why IT pros and MSPs are making the switch—and best practices for a smooth transition.
What you’ll learn in this guide:
Setup & Maintenance
Understand the setup differences and hidden costs of ManageEngine (on-prem) vs. Auvik (cloud-based).
Features & Frustrations
Get side-by-side comparisons of key features and frustrations, as told by users who switched.
Migration Tips
Get step-by-step advice for a smooth, low-risk transition if you choose to switch from ManageEngine to Auvik.
Get instant access to the guide
in their words
Discover why IT pros are switching from ManageEngine OpManager to Auvik Network Management.
“I’ve tested Pulseway, ManageEngine, SolarWinds, PRTG, and Domotz. Auvik blasts the other ones out of the water. In addition to the topology and the user interfaces, there is nothing like Auvik from a display or user experience perspective. Auvik’s dashboard is clean and not too busy. It’s easy to use, interpret and drill down into a device if necessary. It rapidly detects changes in the network environment and responds quickly with alerts.”
Oda K. (Source: PeerSpot)
“We had a demo of ManageEngine, but setting it up was like pulling teeth. I was in the middle of the demo with the people, and nothing was working right. With Auvik, we were up in 15 minutes after downloading the collector and getting it on the network. It started populating data without the need to provide a lot of information. It went so smoothly. That sold me on it.”
Jeremy C. (Source: PeerSpot)
“ManageEngine was particularly challenging due to its lack of user-friendliness. New hires consistently struggled to navigate the platform, requiring extensive training. Thankfully, this isn’t the case with Auvik… The deployment is straightforward and takes 30 minutes to set up, create the site, and deploy Auvik. One person is enough to deploy Auvik.”
Technical Project Manager (Source: PeerSpot)
“We did look into ManageEngine… Auvik was easier to get configured and it was easier to understand the data. Overall, it was more than just user-friendly and had a good price scheme.”
Tim O. (Source: PeerSpot)